Comparison
Lemlist is popular, but it comes with a steep price tag and locks you into their ecosystem. Here is how Beeving offers a better deal for teams that want powerful outreach at a fair price.
At a glance
What each tool includes, as published on their site and ours. Facts only in this table.
| Feature | Beeving | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $39/mo |
| Free plan | - | |
| Inbox rotation | ||
| Email warm-up | ||
| Multi-step sequences | ||
| EU data hosting | - | |
| Full data export | - | |
| Contact management | ||
| LinkedIn automation | - | |
| Per-sender analytics | - | |
| Smart sending limits | - |
Why teams switch
Beeving is cheaper at every tier, with a free plan (email-only sign-up) to start.
Faster to set up, easier to use, focused on the features you need.
Full export, EU hosting, GDPR-compliant. Your data is always yours.
Better for European senders and prospects alike.
Pricing
Lemlist starts at $39 per month for their Email Starter plan, which limits you to just one sending email. Their Email Pro plan costs $69 per month. For teams, the cost adds up quickly.
Beeving takes a different approach. There is a free plan, with email-only sign-up. Starter is 19.99 euros per workspace per month, Growth is 49.99 euros and Pro is 89.99 euros, with about two months saved on yearly billing. Every user is included. Even at the highest tier, you pay less than Lemlist's Scale plan, and you get more flexibility with senders and users.
Beeving
Free plan · Email-only sign-up · Yearly billing saves about two months
Lemlist
As published on their site, per user per month, at the time of writing.
In detail
Both Beeving and Lemlist offer warm-up features and inbox rotation to protect your sender reputation. Lemlist uses their own warm-up network called lemwarm. Beeving includes built-in warm-up with smart sending controls that adapt to your reputation in real time.
Where Beeving pulls ahead is with its EU-based infrastructure. If you send to European prospects, having your emails originate from EU servers can improve deliverability and keep you clear of spam filters that penalize cross-continent sending patterns.
Lemlist offers solid multi-step sequences with conditions and delays. Beeving offers the same core functionality with a cleaner interface. You can create branching sequences based on opens, clicks, and replies, set custom delays, and use A/B testing on subject lines and body copy.
Lemlist's interface has grown more complex over the years as they have added features. If you have ever felt overwhelmed by their campaign builder, Beeving's streamlined approach will be a breath of fresh air.
Both platforms track opens, clicks, replies, and bounces. Beeving provides clear, actionable dashboards on a single screen. Lemlist's analytics are solid but spread across different sections of their UI, making it harder to get a quick overview.
Lemlist has grown into a complex platform with LinkedIn automation, email finding, and CRM features layered on top of the original cold email tool. This means more features, but also more complexity and a steeper learning curve.
Beeving takes the opposite approach. The interface is designed for speed: set up a campaign, add your contacts, write your sequence, and launch. Most users are sending their first campaign within 15 minutes of signing up.
This is where Beeving and Lemlist differ most. With Lemlist, your contacts, campaign data, and performance history live on their platform. Exporting is limited, and leaving means leaving a lot behind.
Beeving gives you full ownership. Export your contacts, campaign data, and analytics at any time, in standard formats. Your data is stored in EU data centers and you stay GDPR-compliant effortlessly.
Switching
Switching from Lemlist to Beeving is simpler than you might expect. Export your contacts from Lemlist as CSV files and import them into Beeving with all custom fields intact. Rebuild your email sequences using Beeving's visual campaign builder, which is faster and cleaner than Lemlist's increasingly complex interface. If you were using Lemlist's LinkedIn automation, consider pairing Beeving with manual LinkedIn touches for a more authentic multichannel approach. Our support team is ready to help you through every step of the transition.
A CSV from Lemlist, with every custom field.
Columns map themselves. Duplicates and blocklisted addresses are dropped.
Same steps, same waits, in the visual builder. Reconnect the mailboxes, warmup starts.
The verdict
Lemlist is a solid tool with a strong community, but you pay a premium for features many teams leave unused. If you want powerful cold email outreach at a fraction of the price, with full data ownership and EU-based infrastructure, Beeving is the smarter choice.
The real question is: are you paying for features you actually use? If LinkedIn automation and email finding are critical to your workflow, Lemlist covers that. For everything else, Beeving delivers more value at every price point. Start for free today and see the difference.
FAQ
Yes. Beeving has a free plan, and Starter is 19.99 euros per workspace per month, compared to Lemlist's $39/mo starter. Even Growth at 49.99 euros, which adds LinkedIn accounts, newsletters and the API, costs less than Lemlist's $69 Email Pro. You save significantly across all tiers.
Absolutely. You can export your contacts and sequences from Lemlist and import them into Beeving. Our support team can help you with the transition to make it as smooth as possible. Most teams complete the migration in under an hour.
Beeving is focused on delivering the best outreach experience possible. While Lemlist offers LinkedIn automation, many users find that a dedicated outreach tool paired with manual LinkedIn touchpoints delivers better results and keeps platform risk low.
Beeving is EU-based and stores all data within Europe, fully GDPR-compliant. With Lemlist, your data is stored on their infrastructure, and exporting it can be limited. With Beeving, you own your data and can export everything at any time.
Lemlist has limited export functionality, which means leaving the platform can be difficult. Some users report losing campaign performance data and history when they switch. Beeving lets you export everything at any time in standard formats, so you stay free to move.
If email is your primary outreach channel, Beeving is the better choice. It is built specifically for email campaigns with superior deliverability features, simpler workflows, and dramatically lower pricing. If email is your main focus, Beeving keeps things simple, while Lemlist adds the complexity of LinkedIn automation and multichannel features.
Other comparisons
Free plan. Sign up with just your email. Cancel anytime, or stay as long as it's working.
Free plan · Email-only sign-up · Cancel anytime